Windows Server 2003 is the follow-up to Windows 2000 Server, incorporating compatibility and other features from Windows XP. Unlike Windows 2000, Windows Server 2003's default installation has none of the server components enabled, to reduce the attack surface of new machines. Windows Server 2003 includes compatibility modes to allow older applications to run with greater stability. It was made more compatible with Windows NT 4.0 domain-based networking. Windows Server 2003 brought in enhanced Active Directory compatibility and better deployment support to ease the transition from Windows NT 4.0 to Windows Server 2003 and Windows XP Professional.[22]
download windows server 2003 enterprise edition sp2 11
Windows Server 2003 comes in a number of editions, each targeted towards a particular size and type of business.[36][37] In general, all variants of Windows Server 2003 have the ability to share files and printers, act as an application server, host message queues, provide email services, authenticate users, act as an X.509 certificate server, provide LDAP directory services, serve streaming media, and to perform other server-oriented functions.[38][39][40][41]
Windows Server 2003 Web is meant for building and hosting Web applications, Web pages, and XML web services. It is designed to be used primarily as an IIS web server[43] and provides a platform for developing and deploying XML Web services and applications that use ASP.NET technology. Domain controller and Terminal Services functionality are not included on Web Edition. However, Remote Desktop for Administration is available. Only 10 concurrent file-sharing connections are allowed at any moment.[citation needed] It is not possible to install Microsoft SQL Server and Microsoft Exchange software in this edition without installing Service Pack 1[citation needed]. Despite supporting XML Web services and ASP.NET, UDDI cannot be deployed on Windows Server 2003 Web[citation needed]. The .NET Framework version 2.0 is not included with Windows Server 2003 Web, but can be installed as a separate update from Windows Update.[citation needed]
Windows Server 2003 Web supports a maximum of 2 physical processors and a maximum of 2 GB of RAM.[42] It is the only edition of Windows Server 2003 that does not require any client access license (CAL) when used as the internet facing server front-end for Internet Information Services and Windows Server Update Services. When using it for storage or as a back-end with another remote server as the front-end, CALs may still be required.[43][clarification needed]
Windows Server 2003 Enterprise is aimed towards medium to large businesses. It is a full-function server operating system that supports up to 8 physical processors and provides enterprise-class features such as eight-node clustering using Microsoft Cluster Server (MSCS) software and support for up to 64 GB of RAM through PAE.[42] Enterprise Edition also comes in specialized variants for the x64 and Itanium architectures. With Service Pack 2 installed, the x64 and Itanium variants are capable of addressing up to 1 TB and 2 TB of RAM,[42] respectively. This edition also supports Non-Uniform Memory Access (NUMA). It also provides the ability to hot-add supported hardware. Windows Server 2003 Enterprise is also the required edition to issue custom certificate templates.[citation needed]
Windows Storage Server 2003, a part of the Windows Server 2003 series, is a specialized server operating system for network-attached storage (NAS).[49] Launched in 2003 at Storage Decisions in Chicago, it is optimized for use in file and print sharing and also in storage area network (SAN) scenarios. It is only available through Original equipment manufacturers (OEMs).[50] Unlike other Windows Server 2003 editions that provide file and printer sharing functionality, Windows Storage Server 2003 does not require any CAL.[51]
Windows Storage Server 2003 NAS equipment can be headless, which means that they are without any monitors, keyboards or mice, and are administered remotely.[52] Such devices are plugged into any existing IP network and the storage capacity is available to all users. Windows Storage Server 2003 can use RAID arrays to provide data redundancy, fault-tolerance and high performance.[53] Multiple such NAS servers can be clustered to appear as a single device, which allows responsibility for serving clients to be shared in such a way that if one server fails then other servers can take over (often termed a failover) which also improves fault-tolerance.[54]
Windows Storage Server 2003 led to a second release named Windows Storage Server 2003 R2. This release adds file-server performance optimization, Single Instance Storage (SIS), and index-based search. Single instance storage (SIS) scans storage volumes for duplicate files, and moves the duplicate files to the common SIS store. The file on the volume is replaced with a link to the file. This substitution reduces the amount of storage space required, by as much as 70%.[55]
Windows Storage Server 2003 R2 provides an index-based, full-text search based on the indexing engine already built into Windows server.[55] The updated search engine speeds up indexed searches on network shares. This edition also provides filters for searching many standard file formats, such as ZIP archives, AutoCAD models, XML documents, MP3 audio files, PDF documents, and all Microsoft Office file formats.
Windows Storage Server 2003 R2 includes built in support for Windows SharePoint Services and Microsoft SharePoint Portal Server, and adds a Storage Management snap-in for the Microsoft Management Console. It can be used to manage storage volumes centrally, including DFS shares, on servers running Windows Storage Server R2.
Windows Storage Server 2003 R2 can be used as an iSCSI target with standard and enterprise editions of Windows Storage Server 2003 R2, incorporating WinTarget iSCSI technology which Microsoft acquired in 2006 by from StringBean software.[56][57] This will be an add-on feature available for purchase through OEM partners as an iSCSI feature pack, or is included in some versions of WSS as configured by OEMs.
Windows Storage Server 2003 can be promoted to function as a domain controller; however, this edition is not licensed to run directory services. It can be joined to an existing domain as a member server.[58]
Windows Server 2003 for Embedded Systems replaced "Windows 2000 Server for Embedded Systems". Intended use was for building firewall, VPN caching servers and similar appliances.[68] Variants were available with "Server Appliance Software" and with "Microsoft Internet Security and Acceleration Server" [69]
The database containing runner information from all those RFID chips will be deployed on an Integrity server with Windows Server 2003 and Microsoft's SQL Server 2000. However, another Integrity server handling all the runner-requested alerts will utilize Linux, PHP and Sendmail. The Linux box will receive inforomation from the Windows server, and PHP scripts will send the data to Sendmail to push out as alerts, explained William Carlisle, director of HP's Microsoft solutions group.
Am I the only one starting to get annoyed by all the allegedly "independent" Linux vs. Microsoft studies concluding Microsoft products are better, which just happen to be funded by Microsoft? One of the latest comes from Security Innovation Inc., which examines two Web server platforms: Windows Server 2003 running Microsoft IIS 6.0, SQL Server 2000 and ASP.net vs. Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3.0 running Apache, MySQL and PHP.
The study only examines default configurations and explicitly excludes anything that could be done to harden the systems, and concludes "the number of vulnerabilities on the Windows Server 2003 platform is considerably less than the number for the Red Hat server." There are a lot of charts and tables in the 37-page PDF, and I admit I haven't gone through each data point to see if I contest it. However, I did find it a little surprising that one table claimed there were zero low-risk vulnerabilities for the Windows Server 2003 setup.
But you can easily avoid these headaches if you have created a system backup in advance. If not, you can create one after fixing Windows Server 2003 system files corrupted issue. You need a reliable server backup software, AOMEI Backupper Server, for example. And you can benefit from the following advantages:
All old and new versions of Windows Server 2003 Firefox editions are available for download from legacy sources. If you are unable to find Windows Server 2003 versions of Firefox below, narrow down your search for the specific platform or app through below links. Apps are listed in chronological order from the release date with latest versions appears on top of the list.
Thinking about installing Windows 2003 on your server? There are several 2003 Editions available such as Standard Edition, Enterprise Edition, Datacenter Edition, and Web Edition, each designed to fit your business needs.
hi am princebill i have windows 8 enterprises i have downloaded .net framework 3.5 full installer 231mb but if try to run it the this box comes up saying windows need to install some feature if i click the button download and install it will start downloading but stops at midway point and says windows feature could not be installed and i hace lost the iso image
Hey,i have a .NET framework v3.5 installed in m windows 7 32 bit. I have an application which need v4.0. i downloaded the v4.0 from the official microsoft website an ran it. It installed correctly but when i open the *Turn windows features on/off* it still shows v3.5 while the *uninstall a program* shows v4.0. My application is not running and is still showing the error that you need .NET framework v4.0. I am helpless. What do i do ?? please help ASAP. :'(
I am happy to announce that Windows Server 2003 Service Pack 2 Release Candidate is available for public review. You can find more information about this release here. Here is the list of what is currently available for public download: Update Package in English and German for 32-bit x86 and Itanium-Based Systems Update Package Read more 2ff7e9595c
Comments